Weigeren Slimme Meter in het Sidhadorp in Lelystad vanwege constante straling. En poster.


Mijn andere websites:




Posters om te kopieren of te downloaden en om In te kleuren. Hiernaast wat toepassingen. (Prikbord, ramen.)

Hoi, We hebben ook een slimme meter aangeboden gekregen, inmiddels geweigerd. De Slimme Meter is nl. niet verplicht. Weigering ging heel gemakkelijk.

Via de website van Liander met deze link ga je gelijk na de "weiger"pagina. Wil je liever opbellen, dan kan dat. Het nummer is: 088 542 6444 (lokaal tarief. Op werkdagen van 8. 00 uur - 17.00 uur). Je kunt hem alleen weigeren als je hem aangeboden krijgt.

Hieronder beantwoording van de vraag of bij blokkering van uitlezen op afstand de GRPS blijft aan staan.

From: INFO at liander.nl

Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 1:35 PM

Subject: Antwoord op uw vraag over de slimme meter [6545982]

Geachte heer,

Op 4 april heeft u ons een e-mail gestuurd. Hierin vraagt u of de GPRS word uitgeschakeld bij het blokkeren van het uitlezen op afstand.

U wilt weten of er dan nog steeds sprake is van straling. In deze e-mail leest u mijn reactie.

GPRS blijft ingeschakeld

Het technische beheer van uw meter blijft zoals het was. Hierbij kunt u denken aan storingsmeldingen en updates die bij uw meter horen.

Er zal echter geen verbinding met uw slimme meter worden gemaakt om de meterstanden af te lezen.

Straling en uw slimme meter?

Het stralingsniveau van uw meter is hetzelfde als van een mobiele telefoon. De straling blijft daarmee ver binnen de gestelde normen.

Heeft u nog vragen?

Belt u ons gerust als u vragen heeft. U kunt ons bellen op werkdagen tussen 08.00 en 17.00 uur op telefoonnummer 088 542 64 44 (lokaal tarief).

U kunt mij ook bereiken door deze e-mail te beantwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Liander N.V.


Medewerker Klant & Service

Dus er wordt door Liander geschreven, dat GPRS blijft ingeschakeld . Met andere woorden: er is nog steeds sprake van straling, ook al laat je hem blokkeren!

Heb je al een Slimme Meter omdat je zonnepanelen op je dak hebt? Die meter is te vervangen door een digitale meter.

Ben je bij een andere netbeheerder, ga dan naar hun website en zoek op "Slimme Meter".


1. RENDO Netwerken
2.  Cogas Infra en Beheer
3.  Liander
5. Stedin
6. Westland Infra
7. DELTA Netwerkbedrijf
10. Endinet Groep
11. Enexis

Zie ook Per 1-1-15 wordt de slimme meter grootschalig aangeboden weigeren mag waarom dat de slimste en gezondste keuze is.

En http://www.fortunecreatinghomes.co.uk/principles/:

Electro Smog

Evidence is emerging that many people are sensitive to emitted radiation from proximity to a variety of electrical sources, such as mobile or cordless phones,

Wi Fi, ‘Smart Metres', electrical cables and equipment such as computers, high tension cables, phone masts and radio transmitters.

For instance, cables carrying electricity emit an electro-magnetic field. Sitting or sleeping in close proximity to cables in walls, outlets or appliances, for prolonged periods can interfere with

the natural cycles and rhythms of the body. For this reason Maharishi Vastu includes such measures as SHIELDED ELECTRICAL CABLES and recommends that WiFi computer connection

and cordless phones be excluded in favour of cable connection. Recommendations are also given for site selection in relation to mobile phone masts and high tension cables.

En http://fairfieldsafemeters.com/2012/06/

Gezondheidsproblemen (English, USA.) en http://emfsafetynetwork.org/


Quote from this site.

Growing Evidence of Health Risks From RF Exposure

Copyright © Prof. James F. Tracy , Global Research, 2013

The main health concern with electromagnetic radiation emitted by smart meters and other wireless technologies is that EMF and RF cause a breakdown in the communication between cells in the body, interrupting DNA repair and weakening tissue and organ function. These are the findings of Dr. George Carlo, who oversaw a comprehensive research group commissioned by the cell phone industry in the mid-1990s.

When Carlo's research began to reveal how there were indeed serious health concerns with wireless technology, the industry sought to bury the results and discredit Carlo. Yet Carlo's research has since been upheld in a wealth of subsequent studies and has continuing relevance given the ubiquity of wireless apparatuses and the even more powerful smart meters. “One thing all these conditions have in common is a disruption, to varying degrees, of intercellular communication,” Carlo observes. “When we were growing up, TV antennas were on top of our houses and such waves were up in the sky. Cell phones and Wi-Fi have brought those things down to the street, integrated them into the environment, and that's absolutely new.”[10]

In 2007 the BioInitiative Working Group, a worldwide body of scientists and public health experts, released a 650-page document with over 2000 studies linking RF and EMF exposure to cancer, Alzheimer's disease, DNA damage, immune system dysfunction, cellular damage and tissue reduction.[11]

In May 2011 the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer categorized “radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless cellphone use.”[12] MORE


[1] Energy.gov, “President Obama Announces $3.4 Billion Investment to Spur Transition to Smart Energy Grid,” October 27, 2009,

[2] Ilya Sandra Perlingieri, “Radiofrequency Radiation: The Invisible Hazards of Smart Meters,” August 19, 2011, GlobalReserach.ca, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26082

[3] Dr. Bill Deagle, “Smart Meters: A Call for Public Outrage,” Rense.com, August 30, 2011, http://www.rense.com/general94/smartt.htm . Some meters installed in California by Pacific Gas and Electric carry a “'switching mode power-supply' that ‘emit sharp spikes of millisecond bursts' around the clock and is a chief cause of ‘dirty electricity.'” See Perlingieri, “Radiofrequency Radiation: The Invisible Hazards of Smart Meters.” This author similarly measured bursts of radiation in excess of 2,000 microwatts per meter every 30 to 90 seconds during the day, and once every two-to-three minutes at night.

[4] Magda Havas, BRAG Antenna Ranking of Schools, 2010,

[5] Susan Luzzaro, “Field of Cell Phone Tower Beams,” San Diego Reader , May 18, 2011,

[6] FCC Office of Engineering and Technology, http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety

[7] Luzzaro, “Field of Cell Phone Tower Beams”; Marc Freeman, “Cell Towers Could Be Coming to More Schools,” South Florida Sun Sentinel , January 5, 2012,

[8] Amy Worthington, “The Radiation Poisoning of America,” GlobalResearch.ca, October 9, 2007, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025

[9] Worthington, “The Radiation Poisoning of America.”

[10] Sue Kovach, “The Hidden Dangers of Cell Phone Radiation,” Life Extension Magazine , August 2007, http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2007/aug2007_report_cellphone_radiation_01.htm

[11] Susan Luzzaro, “Field of Cell Phone Tower Beams”; Bioinitiative Report: A Rationale For a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard For Electromagnetic Fields, http://www.bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/report/index.htm .

[12] World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer, “IARC Classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic,” May 31, 2011, www. iarc .fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf ; Joseph Mercola, “Be Aware: These Cell Phones Can Emit 28 Times More Radiation,” Mercola.com, June 18, 2011,
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/06/18/finally-experts-admit-cellphones-are-a-carcinogen.aspx .

[13] American Academy of Environmental Medicine, “Proposed Decision of Commissioner Peevy [Mailed 11/22/2011] Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California,” January 19, 2012. www.aaemonline.org

[14] American Academy of Environmental Medicine, “The American Academy of Environmental Medicine Calls for Immediate Caution regarding Smart Meter Installation,” April 12, 2012, http://www.aaemonline.org/

[15] Havas, BRAG Antenna Ranking of Schools, 31-38.

[16] Donna Goldstein, “Health Organization Information and Academic Research Studies Regarding the Health Effects of Cell Tower Signals,”Planning and Real Estate Development, Palm Beach County School District, January 30, 2012.

[17] Havas, BRAG Antenna Ranking of Schools, 17.

[18] Multinational Monitor, “Precautionary Precepts: The Power and Potential of the Precautionary Principle: An Interview with Carolyn Raffensperger,” September 2004, http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2004/09012004/september04interviewraffen.html .

[19] Luzzaro, “Field of Cell Phone Tower Beams.”

[20] Kovach, “The Hidden Dangers of Cell Phone Radiation.”

James F. Tracy is Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. He is an affiliate of Project Censored and blogs at memorygap.org .



email: info@wolmanzouten.nl